Development environment is overblowing it. But it did one very important trick.
But first, why would anyone want to hand-code a website? (Does anyone else hand-code any more?)
- Having a server-side website CMS hacked is frustrating
- Having plain html files on the server makes your site faster
- If you're a control-freak like me, you want to write your own clean code, rather than allowing a system to generate unnecessary unreadable guff.
The first thing you notice when you hand-code a site, even a small one, is that if you make a change to code that appears on all pages, it's a huge PITA to go through all pages making the same change.
Hence that trick I mentioned. Those blue links in the screenshot are where an 'object' is inserted. An object is stored once, you edit it once and when you 'compile' the site, those placeholders on all pages are expanded. In the same operation, the app uploads the compiled pages to the server by ftp or sftp. Obviously, clicking that blue link in the editor loads the object for editing. The editor has forward and back navigation buttons.
That's a very brief overview. I've been using this myself for years. But as with tools you write for yourself, it's not very well-refined.
I've been thinking that I may not be alone in my wish to manage small sites this way. I guess most people who don't want a server-side CSM will be using a visual website creator on their computer.
I've decided to improve this to the point where it's a credible commercial (initially free) app and see what interest there is.
It's not ready yet. The whole object / compiling / uploading trick works, I've been using that for a long time. I now have basic syntax colouring working and before any kind of release, I plan to build in these features:
- A button to trigger 'Tidy', a unix html tidying utility (can also do some validation)
- Preview of selected page, updated as you type
- Compress (remove whitespace) before uploading
Is this of interest to you? Are there other features you'd like in such an app? Let me know.